Lale DURUIZ
Import substitution development model was adopted in 1960 and the automotive industry was identified as the driving force for industrialization in Turkey. Government tried to create an attractive climate for domestic and foreign investments in assembly sector. High profitability was almost guaranteed since entrepreneurs were protected against foreign competition by high tariff barriers and encouraged by tax exemptions and preferential exchange rates for the imported technology.
Passenger car production started in 1966 with Otosan's fiber glass bodied Anadol model through a unique dealer -assembler agreement with Reliant Motor Company of Britain. The government gave the priority to local production of automobiles under licensed technologies towards the end of the 1960s. Thus, Oyak-Renault was established via licensing agreement with Renault in France in 1969 and Tofa_ was formed in cooperation with Fiat SpA in 1968. Investment permits to both companies were issued with the conditions of achieving 85% local content rate in the fifth year of production. The deficiencies of the regulations were no measures for the development of components sector, no concern about development of technological capabilities and about economies of scale. The vehicle importers and multinationals were anxious not to lose their existing markets and wanting also to exploit this attractive climate, became interested in assembly plants. The nominal rate of protection by tariffs was one of the highest within the Turkish manufacturing industry (280.2%) high costs could easily be reflected in prices under the prevailing oligopolistic market conditions. Rate of return were very high, although in varying degrees depending on the overhead costs of the firms. Although local content levels achieved in the period were around 60 %, increasing production levels created a high demand for foreign exchange to import the remaining 40 %. Because of balance -of-payment difficulties, manufacturers' foreign exchange allocations were limited, which restricted the companies' production programs. In spite of the high demand for transport vehicles in the period, capacity utilization only reached 68% for the automotive sector.
Global integration were considered in the development plans and incentives for the foreign producers were taken to the agenda. The number of the foreign investments in the automotive sector rose to 99 in 1995 from 13 in 1980.
| Year | 1975 | 1980 | 1985 | 1989 | 1990 | 1991 | 1992 | 1993 | 1994 | 1995 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Car Production | 67,293 | 31,529 | 60,353 | 118,314 | 118,314 | 167,556 | 195,574 | 265,245 | 212,651 | 223,414 |
| Car Import | 7,094 | 65,390 | 33,651 | 52,173 | 101,610 | 24,921 | 21,651 | |||
| Car Export | 8,220 | 5,533 | 5,790 | 8,996 | 6,846 | 12,802 | 33,163 | |||
| Cap. Utilisation % | 82 | 36 | 64 | 83 | 76 | 79 | n.a. | n.a | 54 | 47 |
With 60 million inhabitants, the market seems unsatisfied with one car per 26.7 people (5.7 in Greece, 1.9 in Italy). The two dominant firms (TOFA_ and OYAK-RENAULT) shared 90 percent of the market until 1990 and with the entrance of some other producers(See Table 2) decreased to 81 % in 1995. Honda, Hyundai and Mazda with 100.000 capacity have got permissions to start production in Turkey soon. The main importers today are Toyota, Mazda, Honda, Nissan, Hyundai, Kia, BMW, Lada, Skoda, Tavria. Among those only Eastern European imports were cheaper as a result of the customs duties. However, in 1995 EU and EFTA 1 imports rose significantly.
The resulting competition has increased the concern of the sector with productivity increase (which is very low, 125 cars per worker at the assembly line compared to 250 in EC), quality improvement and product diversity which have been in turn, important motives for new technologies, investment and increase of capacity.
The automotive industry has been enjoying high profitability. Net income after tax was 19 % in 1991, but it has come down to 0.4 in 1994. The increase in material and parts costs are the main cause for this decrease since labor costs and taxes did not change significantly (see the below table). The foreign exchange rates has caused the sectors with imported parts to decrease the material cost of parts but not in automotive. Profitabity seems to be transferred to the foreign partner and to the suppliers.
| Firms | Starting Year of production | Licence | Foreign Cap. % | Production 1995 Capacity (Cars/Year) | (Nov. 95) Cars sold | Market Share (Nov. 95) % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Opel | 1990 | Gen. Motor | 100 | 15,000 | 855 | 3 |
| Otosan | 1959 | Ford | 30 | 30,000 | 1,096 | 4 |
| O. Renault | 1971 | Renault | 57 | 150,000 | 7,995 | 32 |
| Toyotasa | 1994 | Toyota | 50 | 100,000 | 2,310 | 9 |
| Tofas | 1971 | Fiat | 41.5 | 200,000 | 12,668 | 51 |
| Year | 1992 Realized | 1983 Realized | 1994 Realized |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capacity Development | 80,862,880 | 166,122,160 | 290,400,000 |
| Modernization | 25,991,640 | 89,138,720 | 109,400,000 |
| New Model Development | 51,983,280 | 97,242,240 | 225,700,000 |
| Quality Development | 5,775,920 | 16,207,040 | 43,400,000 |
| Localization | 112,630,440 | 12,155,280 | 25,300,000 |
| Others | 11,551,840 | 24,310,560 | 11,900,000 |
| Total | 288,796,000 | 405,176,000 | 706,100,000 |
| Sales | Material | Wage | Tax | Mark-up | |||||
| Q | C | W | T | M | M/Q | C/Q | W/Q | T/Q | |
| 1990 | 7,916 | 4,518 | 373 | 1,553 | 1,472 | 0,19 | 0,57 | 0,05 | 0,20 |
| 1991 | 12,271 | 7,661 | 764 | 2,386 | 1,460 | 0,12 | 0,62 | 0,06 | 0,19 |
| 1992 | 20,875 | 14,006 | 1,035 | 3,831 | 2,003 | 0,10 | 0,67 | 0,05 | 0,18 |
| 1993 | 59,351 | 38,684 | 2,850 | 13,197 | 4,620 | 0,08 | 0,65 | 0,05 | 0,22 |
| 1994 | 64,750 | 45,023 | 3,814 | 13,470 | 2,443 | 0,04 | 0,70 | 0,06 | 0,21 |
This section will evaluate the automation level, product development, productivity, employment structure, training activities, unionism, task rotation, suggestion systems, TQM/TPM applications, environment projects of the two foreign licenced (Fiat and Renault) firms which has been holding 80-90 percent of the market since 1970's.
Automation Level | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| TOFAS
Started with engine section then welding unit is established
CAD in design of some parts
| RENAULT
Started as an assembly plant, weilding department is established
first then engine section.
Welding- automated system has been launched recently
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Product Development | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| TOFAS
1971 bird series, similar models with same engine
Totally 45 different versions
| RENAULT
1971 R.12 TX
1994 R.19 Europa
Totally 50 different versions of Renault in the Product Development
Part
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Productivity (car/worker) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| TOFAS
1990 15.9
* 1993 42.5 hrs./car Eventhough, there seems an effort in increasing the productivitiy, a major productivity gaps exist in more sophisticate operations, e.g. body shop, engine shop, complicated assembly sections.
| RENAULT
1990 18.5
* Capacity max, 650 car/day 350 car/day in 1996 The productivity has increased significantly after 1990's however still lower than European and Japanese competitors.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Employment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| TOFAS
The table shows that the increase in the number of workers is cut down by the 94 crisis. Other employees are not affected by the crisis, such as the steady increase in engineers. Training Training seminars are given by the capital goods suppliers ; some technicians are sent abroad ; most of the training is on technology and maintenance, then comes quality. Orientation training is said to be given to a new worker. 'Service after sale' personnel and represantatives are also trained (1829 man-course in 1994) Average traning period is 20 hrs./employee in 1994, 17.2 hrs./employee in 1995. A training center for 903 employee is established in 1995, the old one was for 144 in 1992. 4,102 employee were trained in 1992 which has increased to 14,510 in 1995.
| RENAULT
The steady state in the number of workers has changed in 94 crisis.
Other employees are not affected by the crisis. Training
Training institution is established last year, electronics and
electrial systems are taught to the workers in groups of 14.
One worker gets training of 45 hr/year in average.
Some techicians are trained abroad in Siemens or Renault. Capital goods suppliers train their experts to the factory for the adaptation of new technology.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unionism | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| TOFA_
Turkish-Metal-Work union, which does not have much strength, appriciates the works of management. In the 94 economic crisis many workers were fired and retired and the union could not act against it.
| RENAULT
Turkish Metal-Work union "applause"s the TQM applications. Not very strong. In the 94 economic crisis many workers were fired and retired and the union could not act against it.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Task rotation | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| TOFA_
Task rotation seems to take place more on Taylorist line than the Fordist Line, in engine department. In assembly not much task rotation is applied. Each worker does a specific job.
| RENAULT
Not many tasks are rotated, in contrast, skilled substitute working take the place of the absent worker. In assembly not much task rotation is applied. Each worker does a specific job.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Suggestions | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| TOFAS
0.34 suggestion per worker per year which seems close to Europe avarage of 0.4 is declared by the firm. | RENAULT
There has been few suggestions which has been realized, for example, holes on the table for the pistons, some hooks for the tables. Technicans were working to change the electrical system to electronic systems. Suggestion system at this level works more efficiently.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
TQM/TPM-Applications | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| TOFA_
In 1993 the firm started TOFA_ 2000 project which aims at Total Excellence. Customer focus have started with service after sale (24 hrs working, emergency units) Statistical process control have started in the factory. Training and application of TPM have started, 25 % of the white collar workers have been trained in PDCA. The firm started working for ISO 9000 | RENAULT
It is declared that TQM, TPM are applied since 1989, However, the marketing firm of OYAK-RENAULT (MAIS) declared that they do not believe in TQM, the foreign partner urges them for the applications. The assembly line does not have quality sections separetely, so in that sense all the workers are producers and controller at the same time. Statistically process charts and TQM reward system seems working, however all these applications are coming from the top management and hanging in the air for the time being. The firm is working for ISO 9000. They have started training for TPM. But there is a maintenance department working.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Projects on Environment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| TOFA_
Started a new project ; - 2000 cc Tempra (green cars) production - Precautions for water and air pollution in the factory.
| RENAULT
Ergonomic precautions have taken place inside the plant. Not very sensitive about the green cars. The firm's gray cars, when polution filters are placed on exaust pipe, do not work properly. As a result, the cars with filters gets the licence and then takes the filters out. |
ANSAL, H., Technical Change and Industrial Policy : The Case of Truck Manufacturing in Turkey, World Development, Vol. 18, No 11,1990.
Association of Automotive Parts Manufacturers, Turkish Automotive Parts and Components Industry, unpublished report, July 1995.
DURUIZ, L. and YENTÜRK, N., Facing the Challenge, Turkish Automobile, Steel and Clothing Industries' Responses to the Post-Fordist Restructuring, Ford Foundation,1992.
NEDIMOGLU, F., Evaluation of Suppliers of Automotive sector on the way to Customs Union, paper presented to the Automotive and Suppliers Symposium, 3-4 November 1995.
OSD, Automotive Manufacturers Association General and Statistical Information Bulletin, Turkish Automotive Manufacturers, Part I, 1995.
TEZER. E., Automotive Industry and Customs Union, paper presented to the Automotive and Suppliers Symposium, 3-4 November 1995
TMMOB, IV Automotive and Suppliers Symposium, 3-4 November 1995.
TMMOB, Turkish Automobile Industry Productivity Analysis, 1993 Congress of Industry, Nov 1993, Bursa.
YENTÜRK, N., Automotive Sector and Changing Profit Margins
1988-1994, unpublished report, 1996.