| La lettre du GERPISA | no 98 (décembre 1995) |
Nouvelles du Programme
The 4th International Gerpisa Meetings will be financed by the participants themselves, unlike the three first ones. Its purpose is to start up the second programme.
STOP PRESS: Oxford University Press has formally agreed to offer a contract to publish the "Trajectories" book and is looking forward to reviewing the synopses of the other books.
It became evident that this second theme could not be treated in general: the relationships between the automobile and society depend precisely on the society under consideration. During the first programme, it became clear to what extent the characteristics of the demand for automobiles, including in the industrialized countries with high rates of autombile ownership, were linked to the class structures of the various countries, to income distribution, to the symbolic role played by the automobile in processes of social definitions, to national policies in terms of transport, taxation, urbanization, etc. It appears that one of the great challenges in the globalization of production and sales by companies is their capacity to understand the evolution of relationships between the supply of automobiles and the new attitudes of the different categories of populations and governments in the countries where they are trying to establish their presence, taking account of the competition. The second great challenge, of course, is the capacity to understand local employment relationships and to manage their diversity, it being understood that each implies adaptations, or even changes to production organization so that it remains efficient.
A first plan which was developed in these terms as a basis for further reflection will be enriched by the discussion which took place.
Because the discussion of the contents of the book "New industrial models" and of the introductory chapters of the thematic books took longer than planned, the Saturday morning discussion which was to review the first programme - organization, functioning, procedures - was set aside. We thought it would be possible to save time here, given the excellent nature of the previous in-depth discussions. This was perhaps a mistake, because the lack of review of the first programme affected the discussion on the second programme. Some of the proposals made implied forms of cooperation different from those that GERPISA has tried to create. They revealed either a misunderstanding of what we were trying to achieve, or a different interpretation of our past experience. In fact, content and form are intimately linked. It would therefore appear necessary to undertake this self-examination in order to gain the maximum benefit from the first programme and to launch the second with a full understanding of the GERPISA process.