| La Lettre du GERPISA | no 135 (octobre 1999) |
Editorial - Michel Freyssenet
Nonetheless, this astonishing proliferation can also be interpreted as a sign of unrest among automobile constructors who can't really grasp just how automobile demand has been restructured and diversified. Even though many constructors applauded deregulation in the realm of employee relations, which subsequently gave them the long-desired degree of flexibility, they were not able to clearly predict the consequences of this on the automobile market itself, both from a quantitative and a qualitative standpoint. Indeed, it now is dependent on a more competitive national revenue distribution among workers, one which is much more variable in time, and also socially more differentiated. Meanwhile, the automobile still remains one of the major distinctive signs of social integration, even more so today when the transition to a new economic and social status it demonstrates is here to stay. Work and the market go together : both interact incessantly.
The more classical demand, prudently organized in a sort of hierarchy,
no longer generates sufficient volume. New types of demand are multiplying;
they are different and unstable, thus requiring the conception of new products
with fewer and fewer elements shared among them. All automobile constructors
do not have the capacity nor the possibility to correctly apprehend and
satisfy these new demands, all the while reaping profits especially in
light of the "firm governing compromise" which is theirs today.