| La Lettre du GERPISA
| no 102
|
Book note - Nicolas Hatzfeld
LEAN WORK
Steve Babson (ed.),
Detroit,
Wayne State University Press, 1995, 380 pages.
In his introduction, Steve Babson (the book's editor) criticizes the schematic
and normative use of the term "lean production", and defines the notion of
"empowerment" of workers. He then introduces seven controversies.
- "Lean production" logics : Mike Parker and Jane Slaughter define this as a
system of reducing costs thanks to "stress management". For John Paul
MacDuffie, this allows workers to develop their competence, their social
networks and identification with the firm. It also allows for unions to
redefine their mission. According to Adrienne Eaton, this system is, in
essence, neither an exploitive one nor one that favors social progress.
However, unions can not define their objectives only in terms of the firm's
goals.
- "Lean production" in Japanese history : John Price analyzes the formative
years of this system in Japan, from 1946 to approximately 1970. Hideo Totsuka
studied unions in firms such as Toyota and Nissan in Japan. According to him,
the Japanese model is a pluralistic one, and results from unique circumstances.
Methodology : Karel Williams and his colleagues reject MIT's method, explaining
that it can not handle the numerous differences between factories and
vehicles. They propose another type of analysis. Candace Howes explains that
Japanese constructors most probably do not export to their American transplants
the core functioning of their production system. Finally, John Paul MacDuffie
and Frtiz K. Pil respond to criticisms by describing continual adjustments to
the comparison made by MIT.
- Six case studies : Laurie Graham analyzes "lean production" in the
Subaru-Isuzu factory, a firm lacking a union. Paul Adler presents NUMMI which
he defines as a form of "democratic Taylorism". James Rinehart, Chris Huxley
and David Robertson examine contrasting results in the GM-Suzuki (CAMI) joint
venture which led to the 1992 conflict. Similar conflicts erupted in the Mazda
firm, and are presented by Steve Babson. The last two cases involve Mexico. For
Harley Shaiken, the results of the Hermosillo factory justifies for Ford its
delocalization strategy. On the other hand, Susan Helper unveils the hidden
costs of of the Maquiladoras transplants.
- Two European models of elevated salaries and participative organization of
work: According to Christian Berggren, the Volvo factory in Uddevalla continues
tobe a viable alternative to "lean production". Ulrich Jurgens underlines the
German model and its exceptionally high level of worker qualification and
automization.
- Training : James Jacob analyzes the MACI system, a Toyota and Nippodenso
jointventure, lacking unions : training is concentrated on qualified personnel
whereas the training of production workers is limited to memorizing standard
procedures. Gary Saganski describes the existence of a very different training
program at Rouge Steel : the presence of unions, training focused on
semi-qualified workers, and the use of colleagues as trainers.
- Public policy : William Green seriously questions trends which compromise
labor laws in the name of new relations brought on by "lean production". Irving
Bluestone hopes that a reform of these laws will halt anti-union tendencies and
increase the perspectives of cooperation between management and unions. He adds
that public policy should act as a catalyst.
Retour au sommaire du numéro 102
Retour à la liste des numéros disponibles